Constructive things to do with a fracking drill rig no 106.

Oo-er, it's a well head.

Oo-er, it’s a well head.


So Ed (Davey, that is) has spoken, and all is now OK with fracking. There are those, like Ed’s deputy, Michael Fallon, who have always thought that pulling as much gas out of difficult rock formations as possible is a great idea, but Ed’s speech to the Royal Society last week was, I think, designed to reassure those who worry about fracking and could do with a little soothing. However, I’m not sure that it has had the intended effect. Most of the soothing we already know – that fracking done properly probably won’t compromise water sources; that it probably will not cause dangerous earthquakes; that we need gas in the energy system for some years to come and so on.

We also know (or should) that there will be plenty of gas around to fulfil our system’s needs over the next twenty years without drilling holes all over the country. And that drilling and producing from the huge number of wells across the country that would make up the sort of production levels that Ed now clearly envisages might be a problem in its own right. The debate, I would have thought, ought not to be about whether some wells are drilled to test for resource, which is what the above wider issue is being smuggled in under cover of, but should be in terms of that wider issue itself. Which Ed is clearly signalling at by suggesting that some of the proceeds of this widespread drilling that we don’t really talk about could be placed into a ‘sovereign wealth fund’. A fund that will only become significant if all those pads across the country actually do appear with the wells on them.

I guess, however, that we may well all quieten down at the prospect of a few wells being relatively safely drilled for exploratory purposes. And then we’ll have to watch as they turn, incrementally, into the rash of plants necessary for the realisation of the investment in exploration. We might regret being so quiet about it then.

In the meantime, here is another thought about what you might do to produce the sort of energy you might reasonably expect to get, one way or another, by drilling those fracking holes. I’ve ruminated on the comparative economics of producing far more climate friendly gas from an extensive roll-out of anaerobic digestion plants. You could perhaps go a bit further than that, and use almost exactly the same drill plants to produce another low-carbon equivalent, and drill for geothermal energy. Interestingly, geothermal drilling does involve almost the same processes up to a point – you drill a deep hole, you find a resource, and water gushes up. Except, on this occasion, you don’t need to inject a huge amount of water and chemicals, and then collect it and dispose of it as hazardous waste. Because the water IS the resource, coming up as hot water at about 74 degrees Celsius. When you’ve taken the heat out of it, you just put it in the sea.

I know a little about this since Southampton, from where I’m writing this piece, has had a geothermal well producing heat (and cooling) for most of the major public and commercial buildings for well over thirty years; energy we might otherwise have been getting from gas-fired boilers in individual boiler rooms over the same period. It arises from a single well head, romantically sited in the car park of the local Toys R Us store. Yes, it’s that threatening. And by the way, geothermal wells do deplete (eventually) by about a degree or so in temperature over a hundred years. So you don’t need to redrill every eight years.

Unfortunately, our friendly neighbourhood well in Southampton is currently the only geothermal heat producing well in the country, but things are stirring. It has been estimated that the geothermal resource (like shale gas, not available uniformly across the country) could supply the equivalent of almost ten gigawatts of installed electricity capacity, or 100 gw of heat per year. The Government’s modest support programme for resource proving in 2010, together with the Renewable Heat Incentive may well get some further projects under way soon. For instance, there is such a project currently underway in Manchester, being promoted by GT Energy, the leading UK geothermal development company. But this is a pinprick compared with what could and should be done. Technically, and economically, there is no reason why perhaps 15% of the UK’s 2030 Renewables Target cannot be provided by geothermal.

Two problems though. Firstly, will all the drill rigs needed to establish viable geothermal plants have been commandeered by gas-hungry frackers over the next few years? Secondly, even if they are not, might some members of the public not mistake a drill rig hard at work on getting hot water out of the ground not think it’s a fracking well and blockade it? It would be nice to think that neither problem will arise and large numbers of places, like Southampton, will be geothermally warmed in years to come. Doesn’t quite look like it right now though.



What goes up will surely not come down….

A slow last week for blog entries. My excuse is that I was rather deeply involved in two events that didn’t, one way or another enable proximity to a computer to be established. Firstly, there was the small matter of the Labour Party in Southampton capturing four council seats in the elections, accompanied by my guilt that if I was not out as often as possible with my friends and colleagues bothering the residents of the city something terrible would happen: but the residents seemed not too bothered as it turned out, and indeed were generally well disposed to the idea that they should go out and vote for us. This is of course, something of a surprise, because it’s a ‘well known fact’ that Labour only did well in a few parts of the north. Look a bit more closely, media, I say.

The other event (not quite so important) was that Southampton Football Club gained promotion to the Championship (hooray). This was taxing and stressful, and involved most of a weekend either preparing, watching or celebrating. I realise the players did have a shift to put in as well, but it must be appreciated that being a happy fan is just as hard work as being (pace Southampton’s recent history) a miserable curmudgeonly fan all of Saturday and Sunday because the team has lost again.  I did observe, however, that politics is never entirely absent from even these events: I watched some ‘official’ recorded scenes of celebration after the game: the players were all greeting the fans in rapturous joint festivities, and across the airwaves came the familiar song ‘we’re coming for you, we’re coming for you, we are Southampton, we’re coming for yooooooou’. Very rousing, except that from where I was standing the day before, I recall a rather different version being sung, which involved some very rude words, reference to a football team just down the coast and some fish. It may be that a family friendly version was indeed being sung in others parts of the ground, but if not, it was good to see the authorities seeking to pour political oil on troubled waters and not petrol.