We were going to get a final decision to go ahead with the two new nuclear reactors at Hinkley point from EDF ‘before the end of the year’ and here we are in 2013 and there isn’t one. In fact, the decision is now rostered for ‘the earliest possible date’ amid talk (admittedly in the Mail on Sunday just before Christmas here) that the delay in the decision is to do with ‘cutbacks at EDF’s parent energy company in France’ and ‘issues negotiating agreement with the British Government over price guarantees’.
Well, it’s true: there are big problems with financial overstretch at EDF and the ‘transparent’ negotiations on strike price with the British government may be getting a little tricky. But is that all, I wonder? I mean, if you were a financially overstretched company contemplating whether to pour billions into a new long-term investment in the UK that would pay for years, might you not think about sweating your existing assets a bit harder instead? Here, for example is what the august Institute of Mechanical Engineers has to say about such a strategy:
For an energy utility company, reactor plant life extension is much more economically attractive compared with the financial risk of new nuclear build. The older reactor is highly cash-generative because interest from its construction debt is already paid-off, whereas new nuclear build reactors do not become significantly profitable until after they have reached their 17 year capital payback period.
Plant life extension is also attractive for government energy policy, because it buys extra time for investment in low carbon technologies and maximises the UK’s carbon emission savings from nuclear electricity generation. However the downside is that reactor lifetime extensions may ultimately delay the introduction of new nuclear build, unless the extra profits are diverted to funding new reactor construction.
I think the IMechE might be set down as being a little prescient, because of course, this is exactly what EDF have done. Indeed, a little remarked announcement at the beginning of last month confirmed life extensions of seven years to two of EDF’s existing nuclear reactors, at Hunterston and, yes, Hinckley Point so that, instead of closing as planned in 2016, they will run now until 2023. This is in addition to the five year extensions handed to EDF last year for two other plants.
So well done EDF for contributing to UK energy security by winning those extensions. (That is not intended to sound sarcastic – it really is a help to UK generating margins in the immediate term that these are happening). What they do, however, is far more helpful to EDF than even the Institute of Mechanical Engineers suggest. Yes, they will get the income from selling electricity from an already amortised plant for seven more years, but they will, as I have previously charted, get large sums of literally ’free money’ from operating into the 2020s. This is because nuclear power plants will not be subject to the Chancellors carbon tax – oops – ‘floor price’ – when it comes in in 2013. However, nuclear power will be sold subject to prices set by gas; the ‘market maker’ as far as those prices are concerned. Gas IS subject to carbon floor price and hence existing nuclear will gather free and without hindrance the full benefit of being able to charge post floor price levels for electricity without paying any of the price hike gained back in tax. Free money indeed (well, it‘s not free to us – the UK customers will cough it up…) – all you have to do is make sure someone turns up to keep the life extended turbines humming, which they do, according to latest energy statistics, about 55% of the time. So on this basis, what would the free money be worth? We can’t be completely accurate, of course, since the chancellor may raise the price he charges in the light of further instabilities in the EU carbon trading price, as he has already done once. But working on what we know about the price over the period, and assuming the two power stations operate at about present levels, we can be fairly sure that each gains AT LEAST £13 billion of free money over the period covered by the life extensions. That’s in addition to the £9 billion per plant that will come EDF’s way from the extensions they were granted in 2011. Sooo…£44 billion on the balance sheet in addition to the money actually earned from producing electricity: not bad going when you’re a bit cash strapped and you’re not sure of the future. Oh, and, according to EDF there will be more life extensions to come as they review the rest of the present operating fleet.
And here comes the big question, then. If you’re getting this amount from your existing nuclear fleet for nothing, would you invest it all in new plant, or as the IMechE points out perhaps ‘delay’ the introduction of all that new risk? I think we might be about to find out in 2013.
Happy New Year 2013 !
=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=
http://blogs.ft.com/nick-butler/2013/01/02/edf-inquiry-puts-brakes-on-uk-nuclear-plans/?Authorised=false
EDF inquiry puts brakes on UK nuclear plans
January 2, 2013 5:01 pm by Nick Butler
EDF faces probe into its relations with China.
A new inquiry instigated by the French government into the
international activities of the French nuclear industry poses a new
challenge to the UK’s plans for a new generation of nuclear power
stations. Further delay in reaching a final decision seems certain.
The formal inquiry, established just before the New Year, will be
undertaken by the powerful Inspection Generale des Finances. The
inquiry is sector wide and focused on potentially inappropriate
transfers of protected technologies through the international
partnerships developed by the nuclear companies. But according to the
French press the inquiry is directed specifically at EDF and its
relationships in China.
=x=x=x=x=x=x=
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/12/25/uk-edf-china-nuclear-idUKBRE8BO03K20121225
EDF declines comment on China nuclear probe report
Tue Dec 25, 2012
Electricite de France (EDF.PA) on Tuesday declined to
comment on a report of a probe into its recent partnership with a
Chinese utility to develop a new type of nuclear reactor.
Several French news websites cited a forthcoming article in satirical
weekly Le Canard Enchaine, due to appear on Wednesday, as saying that
French finance-ministry inspectors had begun an inquiry into the terms
of the China agreement.
“We have no reaction,” a spokeswoman for EDF said, adding she had not
seen the forthcoming article. The French finance ministry was
unavailable for comment.
EDF had said in November that the agreement with China Guangdong
Nuclear Power Corporation Holding GDNCP.UL was to develop a concept
for a 1,000-MW reactor. This would be cheaper and smaller than the
1,600-MW EPR reactor blamed for the loss of a landmark project in Abu
Dhabi in 2009.
(Reporting by Lionel Laurent and Gerard Bon; editing by Patrick Graham)
=x=x=x=x=x=x=
Twitter
Martyn Williams
@MartynWilliams2
28 December 2012
Private Eye say KPMG helping DECC negotiate nuke subsidies with EDF.
That’s KPMG who (a) argued for higher nuke subsidies and (b) audit EDF
=x=x=x=x=x=x=x=
Hi Alan,
There is a good critique of renewable energy and the low value of power from intermittent renewables, such as wind, wave and solar compared to other low energy sources of power such as nuclear and high-head hydro here :
Click to access Renewable%20Energy%20Limitations.pdf
Andrew.
I need money for school an car an house please help
I will right away snatch your rss as I can not in finding your e-mail subscription hyperlink or newsletter service.
Do you’ve any? Please allow me know in order that I may subscribe. Thanks.
I’m really loving the theme/design of your web site. Do you ever run into any browser compatibility issues? A few of my blog readers have complained about my site not working correctly in Explorer but looks great in Firefox. Do you have any tips to help fix this problem?
you are actually a good webmaster. The website loading speed is incredible.
It seems that you are doing any distinctive trick.
In addition, The contents are masterpiece. you’ve performed a wonderful process in this subject!
Hi there! This post couldn’t be written much better! Looking through this article reminds me of my previous roommate! He always kept talking about this. I am going to send this article to him. Fairly certain he will have a great read. Thank you for sharing!
Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have truly enjoyed surfing
around your blog posts. In any case I will be subscribing on your rss feed and I am hoping you write once more very soon!
It’s approximately your own imagination and drive to search out the job that matches you best; it’s around – you need
to simply take it. I can also change my head if I accept
an article and I can’t do it or I don’t want to undertake
it for any given reason. Finally, a proven way that I can
say for certain works well would be to serve as a sales go-between
for many who want to sell their things on ebay and people
who want to buy things on ebay.
Pingback: Carbon Floor Price, skunk works and committee room fourteen | alan's energy blog